So I’m late again, but it’s all for the best because I have
something to add. First, Monday’s numbers:
Starting
Weight:
|
242.6
|
Original Target*:
|
259.4
|
Adjusted Target:
|
240.8
|
Actual Weight:
|
241.6
|
Loss/Gain:
|
–
1.0
|
Total Loss:
|
61.0
|
% of Goal:
|
44.0%
|
Avg. Loss/Wk.:
|
–
2.5
|
*Original target calculated from a
starting weight of 302.6 lbs. and an average loss/wk. of 1.8 lbs.
|
As I reported last week, I “gained” about a pound from
choosing a permanent spot for my scale, so I wasn’t disappointed by losing only
a pound overall. However, I did entertain the hope that today, Aug. 1, would
find me ≤ 240. It didn’t
happen.
In laying
out the Project
Nemesis plan, I wrote, “One week, you’ll do everything right and gain 1.5
pounds. The next week, you’ll blow your diet big time one day and your weight
at the end of the week is down 1.5 pounds.” It can happen daily, too. Tuesday
was full of activity and I had plenty of calories to spare on the budget when I
went to bed. When I woke up, however, my wonky scale informed me that I’d
jumped from 240.8 to 243. What. The. Hell. Yesterday was full of activity as
well; however, I got hit with the late-night munchies and polished off half a
bag of Rold Gold pretzels “off the books.” This morning, the aforementioned
wonky scale said that I was back down to 241. Fine, except the 2-pound spike
had spoiled my small hope to be under 240 today.
I don’t
blog every day partly because, like many in-home caregivers, my day has
unpredictable interruptions and I have other writing and editing commitments to
fulfill. Another part of it is, the daily struggle just can’t be that
interesting. Even a Victor Hugo could drive you mad with such attention to
minutiae; it’s why the movie The Name of the Rose was actually better
than Umberto Eco’s book.
(#sorrynotsorry,
you literature majors. I’m sure some people feel the same about J. R. R. Tolkien’s
The Lord of the Rings. And if you ever have a chance to read William
Goldman’s The Princess Bride, you’ll see the movie was the “good parts”
version of his send-up of overladen “literary classics.” Since Goldman wrote
the screenplay, I doubt he missed or repined over the irony.)
Most
importantly, though, the daily fluctuations aren’t as important as the overall
trend. Yes, more ups than downs turn into a trend upward, so you don’t want to lose
sight of them altogether. But the same is true of the reverse—more downs than
ups lead to a trend downward. So long as the overall trend is down, even at a
pound a week, you’re still losing weight.
Patience
isn’t my strong suit. Much of my adult life has been dedicated to maximizing
what little patience I do have, particularly when dealing with difficult
customers. Nevertheless, it’s the virtue most needed when you’re trying to lose
a lot of weight. Looking at larger trends helps support that patience. It helps
to remind you that you’re getting closer to that final goal, even if you miss a
small goal here and there. While the final goal, ≤ 164 by 8/1/20, helps to keep
me on track, it’s possible the trend will drop below 1.8 lbs./week, making it
an unlikely achievement. If and when that becomes apparent, I’ll adjust the
final goal date to fit the new numbers. The date isn’t as critical as is the
weight loss itself.
And you
never know what will help to keep you motivated. For instance, underwear:
I told
you all about my
closet-diving victory a couple of weeks ago. Over the last week, though, it
occurred to me that my 3XL boxerjocks were getting too loose. Oh, the
waistbands were still tight enough to keep them up, but I had lost the support.
(I like the look and feel of regular boxers under slacks, but not the
occasional pinch between the inseam and your thigh that comes from lack of
support. It’s not as bad as a kick or punch to the groin, but it’s still no
fun.) So yesterday, I bought a pack of XL boxerjocks. The waistband is a little
tight, but the overall fit is much better.
I’ve
also noticed that I’m getting a little more physically restless. I get
uncomfortable sitting in a spot for more than an hour anyway because my left
hip tends to get stiff. As well, I don’t smoke in my brother’s house; I have to
step out onto the porch more frequently than I’d like, given the ordinary heat
of a north-central Texas summer. But now I find myself getting up simply to move,
to burn off excess energy. Although I’m not consistently surpassing 6,000 steps
a day yet—at least, so far as I know—I averaged over 4,800 steps a day in July,
much more than I averaged back in March, the first full month for which I have
data. This is a good thing.
(Sidebar:
The Samsung Health app on my phone tracks my steps but helps to drain the
battery faster. Recently, there have been days I’ve had to put my phone on the
charger for a while in the middle of the afternoon or put it on for the night
before the day was over, leaving hundreds of steps unrecorded. A FitBit,
however, is beyond my wallet right now, so I make do with what I have.)
Clichés
like not seeing the forest for the trees and missing the big picture
usually irritate me. Trees are what make up the forest; change the details and
you change the big picture. But painters don’t put in details solely for their
own sake but rather to contribute to the overall picture. Even on the detail
level, you can’t focus on the negatives more than on the positives, or
vice-versa. And you still have to step back from the details to appreciate the
whole painting. This is why I have monthly
charts and an overall progress chart—to help me keep the daily fluctuations
in perspective.
So
yeah, I’m a little disappointed that I didn’t start off August under 240. But
making the halfway point, 233.3, by 9/1/19 (about 4½ weeks) is still a very
reachable goal. And even if I fall a little short, when I do hit 233, I’ll
still have lost over half the weight I need to lose to have a BMI less than 25.
That will be worth celebrating no matter when it happens.
No comments:
Post a Comment